Home > Commentary > Hostage taking events, media coverage and government broadcast regulation: striking the right balance
Comments (0) Trackbacks (0) Leave a comment Trackback
- RT @: Excellent project. For wider reference, this will also be the home of the https… ; tweeted
- RT @: Coming soon! The Jihadi Document Repository, an FFI/@ collaboration featuring primary sources goi… ; tweeted
- RT @: If you are in business please consider how you can help vets by helping them transition into gainful employment thank th… ; tweeted
- RT @: I hope everyone can a new effort by me & @ called @. RTs are appreciated. Thank you! ; tweeted
Categories
- Abu Walid al Masri (57)
- AF-PAK strategy (84)
- AQ General (107)
- AQ Media (46)
- AQAP (24)
- Arrests and detainee isues (56)
- Articles of interest (213)
- Attacks and Plots (39)
- Commentary (123)
- IMU (2)
- Jihadi spats (4)
- LeT (2)
- Maqdisi (4)
- News of interest (114)
- Open Source Documents (19)
- Operational analysis (19)
- Somalia (13)
- Taliban (68)
- Uncategorized (124)
- Use of information communications technology (63)
Pages
-
Archive
- About the blog’s change of name
- More info on IMU training camp pics
-
My dialogue with Abu Walid al Masri
- Abu Walid’s questions and my response
-
Arabic and English versions of Abu Walid’s answers to my questions
- English trans – Abu Walid’s fifth reponse
- English trans – Abu Walid’s first response
- English trans — Abu Walid’s second response
- First response by Abu Walid al Masri (arabic)
- Response number five by Abu Walid al Masri (arabic)
- Response number four by Abu Walid (araibic)
- Response number six by Abu Walid al Masri (arabic)
- Response number three by Abu Walid (arabic)
- Response number two by Abu Walid (Arabic)
- Old and new in the relationship of the Taliban and al Qaeda – an article by Abu Walid al Masri in response to my op-ed
- The role of the Internet for militants – Abu Walid al Masri’s response to my questions -Arabic
- Bio and contact details
- Hostage taking events, media coverage and government broadcast regulation: striking the right balance
- Long Reads
- Published Work
Copyright Notice
© Leah Farrall and All Things Counter Terrorism, 2009-2015. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Leah Farrall and All Things Counter Terrorism with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Meta
- Register
- Log in
- Entries RSS
- Comments RSS
- WordPress.com
Hostage taking events, media coverage and government broadcast regulation: striking the right balance
I have just created a new page to house an extended series my colleague and I authored and from which we’ve drawn for a range of works. With my colleague Nick’s permission I’ve put a copy up here because this really is an important issue that just hasn’t had the traction that it should in Australia — although its relevance extends out to all those countries facing an increasingly complex threat environment. It is not an anti-media piece or an anti-government piece; it attempts to highlight the risks and to spur a discussion on what more can be done to ensure the safety of all those involved in such incidents is protected. A brief abstract follows the longer series of posts, placed here together for ease of reading.
Survivors of the hostage crisis that rocked Paris in January this year recently filed an unprecedented complaint against French media for endangerment and called for a new legal framework to police live coverage of events. The Paris Prosecutor’s Office is now investigating, while French Broadcast authorities are considering further regulatory action. In the aftermath of the Sydney siege, Australia’s media was heavily lauded for its responsible coverage. But it was not without incident or problems, many of which could have resulted in harm to hostages and adversely affected the outcome of the incident. Because they did not, they are unlikely to come to further attention in Australia, but are nonetheless important to consider. Had events unfolded differently in Sydney, legal action similar to that now underway in Paris could be before Australian courts. This should be cause for concern for Australian media and government. It should also stimulate a discussion between them on whether it is time to codify what type of responsible media practices are required when covering such an event and how these might best be regulated. To date, it has not. In this series of posts we outline the risks of such coverage and look at how other countries have attempted to deal with balancing press freedoms with protecting public safety and order before turning to consider what might be an appropriate response for Australia.
https://allthingscounterterrorism.com/hostage-taking-events-media-coverage-and-government-broadcast-regulation-striking-the-right-balance/
Dr Nicholas Gilmour is a Teaching Fellow at Massey University in Wellington teaching Intelligence, Crime and Security and Crime Science. Nicholas is a former British and New Zealand Police Officer and hostage negotiator. Dr Leah Farrall is a Research Associate at the University of Sydney’s USSC, and a Senior Lecturer in Security Studies at Massey University. She was formerly a Counter Terrorism Intelligence Analyst with the Australian Federal Police.
Share this:
Like this:
Related